Landing caught up to the speed of AI in how we build, serve, and operate, but we have not yet harvested the cost savings. Engineering will always prioritize revenue and guest experience over cutting SaaS, so the objective is for business leaders to rebuild their own small tools. The honest read on the data: the big dollars are moats you cannot easily rebuild; the easy wins are the small line items. The number below is real, not inflated.
Moats, infrastructure, or regulated and security-sensitive systems. Rebuilding these with Claude is not easy and would cost more than it saves: PriceLabs ($84,918, dynamic pricing engine), Rentals United ($59,041, OTA channel manager), Time Doctor ($24,048, workforce monitoring), Koddi ($20,000, ad bidding), cloud and dev infra (about $30k+), and the sticky systems of record (Salesforce, HubSpot, Slack, Dashlane).
What I care about most is using Claude Artifacts for future ELT meetings. A frozen forecast gets approved or rejected as a single point. A live model gets pressure-tested across ranges in minutes, which is how we actually think. Drag the capture slider above and watch the gap move: that is the whole argument made tangible.